The New Zealand Association for Gifted Children


 
Tall Poppies magazine
What are the needs of the gifted child?


by Peter Walters, (BA,Dip.Tchg)

We reproduce here the third and final part of the article “Why Help the Gifted?” by the founder president of the NZAGC. In answering this question, Peter Walters (BA,Dip.Tchg) discussed:

1. What is a gifted child?

2. What are the needs of the gifted child?

3. How can we help the gifted child?

The first part answered the first question and was published in Tall Poppies vol 29 no 1. The second part was published in vol 29 no 2. This article was written nearly thirty years ago—it is sobering to reflect on how little some things have changed in that time.



How can we help the gifted child?

We are here also concerned with a mental health problem. The NZAGC recently [in the early 1970s—ed.] held a survey among its family members. Returns were received from 116 families, involving 123 gifted children. They revealed the following statistics:

  • 45 children (36.6%) received medical attention because of problems associated with their giftedness

  • 33 children (26.8%) received the attention of a psychologist or a psychiatrist or both

  • 20 children (16.3%) received medical prescriptions

  • 14 parents (12.1%) received medical attention from a general practitioner (9) or a psychologist (3) or a psychiatrist (2) because of problems associated with the giftedness of their child.

When asked whether they thought “the upbringing of a gifted child is harder, easier or similar compared to the upbringing of other children”, 67 parents (57.7%) regarded it harder, 15 (12.9%) easier, 24 (20.7%) similar, and 10 (8.6%) expressed no opinion on this matter.

What can the school do?

It is pleasing to note that in the last three years the teaching profession has shown a greater awareness of the needs and problems of gifted children. Several teachers and schools make an effort to provide in some measure for these children. This is, however, by no means universal. Much good work is done in the Auckland Education Board under the guidance of David Freeman, Inspector in Charge of Children with Special Abilities. He has teachers actively involved in providing means of recognising such children and providing suitable programmes for them. Withdrawal groups have been organised in the last two years with the intention of developing units of work suitable for these children. In other parts of the country also, some efforts are made to make provision for these children both in primary, intermediate and secondary schools. There is general agreement that some provision should be made for gifted and talented children.

Vernon, Adamson and Vernon in The Psychology and Education of Gifted Children quote Ogilvie's report on “Gifted Children in Primary Schools", a report to the Schools Council of the Ministry of Education in England. Ogilvie lists the following as the main requirements for an effective scheme for gifted children:

  • they should be able to work along with others of similar ability level

  • they should maintain ample contacts with peers of average ability

  • though not set apart, they should have the opportunity to work by themselves on occasion

  • they need to be stretched or challenged, even to the point of experiencing failure and being humbled thereby

  • they should pass rapidly through the elementary stages of a subject to more advanced work, for which appropriate resources should be available

  • they should be guided rather than directed toward a greater depth of treatment in their studies

  • they should be able to pursue their own lines of research

  • they require contacts with teachers who are expert in their various fields

  • they should have opportunity and encouragement in exercising special talents

  • both children and their parents should have access to counselling

  • last, but not least, they need to be treated like ordinary children

  • Some additional points may be gleaned from various sources:

  • attention should be paid to fostering personal and social, as well as intellectual development, including understanding of, or empathy with, the needs of others

  • efforts should be made to bring into the scheme as many children as possible from minority group or lower-class families, even though they may initially appear less qualified linguistically or less outstanding in achievement than gifted or talented middle-class children

  • any scheme should incorporate procedures for systematic evaluation of its success or failure. It is not sufficient to show that gifted children do better academically or in other respects than average children of their own age. It must be demonstrated that they do better than could have been expected in the absence of special provision, or better than a control group of comparable ability who received no such provision.

The following classification of possible methods is a somewhat modified version of a list published by Roth and Sussman (1974). Naturally there is a good deal of overlapping between the items, and many schools or districts may combine elements from two or more.


Acceleration by:

  • early admission

  • grade-skipping

  • grade telescoping

  • continuous progress—non-grading

  • additional courses in high school and early admission to universities

  • advanced placement

Segregation

  • in separate schools, full-time

  • grouping or streaming according to ability, also referred to as “multi-track” or differentiated instruction

  • specialisation by multiple curricula, options or electives

  • special classes, part-time, serving one or more schools

  • summer or Saturday schools and extracurricular interest groups

Enrichment

  • individual study or small-group work within classes

  • library or resource room projects

  • use of community resources etc


Acceleration implies that the rate of progress through the sequence of work in school is faster than the average. For the gifted child, it means that he is allowed to develop at his own rate. All research leads to the conclusion that this is the best method of providing for gifted children. The practical implications of this cause problems, especially if the educator has fixed views on social adjustment. A five-year-old child was recently admitted to school. He was a gifted child who had taught himself to read, and by rights should join the children in the group that works at an advanced level of reading. The teacher, however, placed the child with the other five-year-old children on the very early readers. Why? Because he was not mature enough to be placed with the more advanced group. Why was he not mature enough? Because he did not relate to the children of his own age, did not play with them or communicate with them. This he had to learn first. Why? No answer is given. The teacher fails to realise that his advanced intellectual achievements make it impossible for him to relate to these children, but would make him quite capable of relating to the older children. He had already passed the so-called five-year-old stage.

Some schools allow children to skip a class. The most suitable points are: from a P4/S1 composite to S2 or a F1/2 composite to F3, more rarely from a S2/3 composite to S4. Other schools have a S2–S4 class which consist of the very bright children drawn from these levels.

Enrichment is the method used by most teachers who have some sympathy with the gifted child in their class. It helps somewhat to alleviate the frustrations, but does not really go far enough to satisfy their need for more advanced work. Personally I am not in favour of complete segregation, but temporary withdrawal periods are used quite successfully by some intermediate and also some primary schools.

What are the results of special programmes? I quote from the Marland Report:


Many studies of acceleration have assessed the effect on children from school entrance to college age. Studies showed that accelerants did better than their peers academically, acquired more honours and experienced fewer psychological problems than did non-accelerants. A number of briefer studies found that acceleration produced no unfavourable results, and the accelerants exceeded their classmates academically, were socially more popular and were better adjusted psychologically.

A summary of a large group of studies indicated that special provisions, including acceleration and various groupings, were beneficial to gifted children. In general, the studies showed that gifted children could condense school requirements with no difficulty and with superior performance.

Follow-up studies of pupils in special classes employed various measures of academic achievement, social adjustment, health and personality. Clear support for special groupings was found. Conclusions derived from the studies generally agreed that participants did not develop personality or social problems, did not become conceited or did not suffer health problems because of pressures; rather, participants showed improvement, not only in academic areas but also in personal and social areas.”


To the individual teacher who is concerned about the gifted in his/her class, I would like to give the following advice. Be aware of the child's potential. If it is proven to be of high intelligence, provide challenging material for the child. Let him read books at a higher level, do advanced projects, work advanced examples in mathematics, even if it means letting the child work from the book of the next class. Inform the parent; inform the teacher of the next year. Even if that teacher does not take any notice and lets the child repeat the work done, it is better that the child has had a good challenging year with you than two years of no challenge. Your memory will be treasured and the experience will enable the child to pick up work better at a later stage when he is again more challenged. The intellectually gifted child wants to see structure in what he learns, so guide him in that direction. Above all, show an interest in what he does, give praise and encouragement, but never set him up as an example for the other children. The child won't like it as it makes him too obviously different from the others. The other children won’t like it because they can never live up to his image.

It is quite wrong to stop young children from taking out library books of a higher level at school, as is the practice in some schools. If the Standard 1 child is ready to read Standard 4 books he should be allowed to do so. By the same token, there should be books of intermediate and higher level available for the gifted child in Standard Three or Four.

If you have an advanced programme operating in your class for a gifted child, have it openly available and do not stop any other bright child using it. If he is not successful he will drop it; if he is, his standard of work is raised. I believe that by providing for the gifted child in the school, we will raise the standard of education for all, just as there is some evidence that too much emphasis on the slower learner has led to some deterioration of standards in the more able children.

The NZAGC was concerned that the 1977 Johnson Report on Sharing, Growing and Learning, in Section 5.5 “Special Needs of Children”, did not mention the special needs of gifted and talented children. The Executive Committee of the NZAGC forwarded to the Minister of Education the suggestion that the following recommendation be added to Section 5.5 of the Johnson Report: “In each school provision will be made in the staffing allocation for one teacher to be placed in charge of the educational needs of gifted and talented children”.

The Minister has forwarded this recommendation to the department that has the responsibility for collating all views expressed about this report. We would like to see one teacher in each school who has the responsibility of looking after the educational needs of all the gifted and talented children in the school. He could guide the class teacher in the design of special programmes for these children; perhaps even plan the programme himself. He could take these children as a group in a withdrawal period for enrichment or acceleration, and generally make sure that feelings of frustration and boredom do not occur.


What does the Association do for gifted children?

Each branch of the NZAGC has set up a club called Explorers Unlimited. The activities are organised by a committee of parents. These could include: a monthly meeting which enables the children to socialise with children of their own level of intelligence, which is so necessary if they are to find their own identity; special interest groups outside school hours such as science, a language, mathematics, astronomy, electronics, etc; outings to various places of interest such as an observatory, museum, factory, etc.

In addition, the local branch also organises a meeting for parents at least once a term to discuss common problems or to meet an expert or panel of experts in child education. The two main achievements of the work of our Association in the last three years have been children gaining a better self-concept, losing their sense of loneliness and finding it easier to relate to other children and find friends; parents gaining a greater understanding of their child and being able to develop a better relationship with their gifted children.

How can parents help their gifted child?

It is your child; you have a duty towards this child. You will need to devote about 20 years of your life to this child. It may not be rewarding. It could be most enjoyable. That depends on your attitude.

Do not seek self-glorification—you are going to be disappointed. Your child may turn against you.

Accept your child for what he is. Accept his high intelligence, which may be much higher than yours, but don't use it as a weapon. "If you are so intelligent why did you do such a stupid thing?" That kind of remark is out. In the first place, they are still children, fallible and able to do stupid things like any other child. In the second place, perhaps it was not so stupid after all, but your interpretation was.

Do not get upset if your child corrects you, offers a better solution to a problem, beats you at any game, is able to hold a better conversation with a visitor than you are.

Enjoy it; learn from the child. Teaching is not a one-way process; it is a two-way street. Both teacher and learner learn and teach, and that also applies to the first and best teacher the child ever gets, his parents.

If an interest is aroused: music, sport, a research topic, whatever, encourage it, help the child to find information and resources. I know it costs time, but that is your job as parent. If the interest wanes, try to find out why, give more encouragement: “Yes, you can do it”. Gifted children are very self-critical and often perfectionists. They need to be reassured that they can do it, more so than other children. On the other hand, do not force the issue if there is absolutely no interest left. It is better dropped for your sake and the child's sake.

Try to get the best teachers for your child. If you do not succeed and there are problems, discuss these with the child. Don't always hold the teacher as correct. The child is quite capable of realising that we are dealing with human beings who are fallible and may do some stupid things, even though placed in responsible positions. At least let the child know that you, the parent, understand and will support him. You are his only security until he can manage on his own.

Do not expect the child to be like other children. If he likes reading a lot, let him. Don't force him to play if he does not want it. Never ever say to your child, your gifted child: “Why can't you be like other children?” or “Why can't you be like a normal child?” The child has enough awareness of this difference without you rubbing it in.

Your child needs to learn to accept himself for what he is. All children need to learn this. A child can only do this if you, as the parent, let him be himself, and accept him for what he is.

Perhaps I can express your relationship to your children best by a poem by Kahlil Gibran, called “Children”:


Your children are not your children.

They are the sons and daughters of Life's longing for itself.

They come through you but not from you,

And though they are with you yet they belong not to you.

You may give them your love but not your thoughts,

For they have their own thoughts.

You may house their bodies but not their souls,

For their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams.

You may strive to be like them, but seek not to make them like you.

For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.

You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.

The Archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite, and He bends you with His might that His arrows may go swift and far.

Let your bending in the Archer's hand be for gladness;

For even as He loves the arrow that flies, so He loves also the bow that is stable.





What's on
EVENTS
Getting Started
Find a Psychologist
The National Body
NZAGC Home
What do we do?
What is giftedness?
Contacts
National Council
Branches
Discussion Forum
Library
Links

Tall Poppies magazine

Apex: NZ Journal of Gifted Education

Membership Form Our Constitution
For the Branches
- start a support group
- set up a branch
- set membership criteria
- run a clubday
- set up management systems
For Members
Library Info
Full listing of books Request a book

Find your way around this site
Site Map

Help! Now What!? Robyn Wilson's guide to resources for parents of gifted children